NeoAistriqACADEMY
Sign in

INSPECT THE PROGRAM BEFORE APPLYING

See the work. Understand the review.

Your experience shapes the project. Progress depends on work you can show, explain and improve.

See a sample capstone

Run a fictional account support handoff and inspect its walkthrough, evaluation results and business-impact measurement method.

Open the interactive sample capstone

A walkthrough of your learning journey

  1. Apply with your experience

    Describe a workflow, your goals, time and current skills. A person reviews suitability. Applying does not charge you.

  2. Review the personal offer

    Confirm the project direction, regional price, reviewer, tools, support, dates and terms before payment.

  3. Confirm your plan

    Review the AI-assisted plan and its assumptions. Adapt it with the responsible reviewer when the industry or scope needs clarification.

  4. Learn and practise

    Use Academy teaching, worked examples and separate fictional exercises. Save original inputs, actual outputs, checks and corrections.

  5. Improve with feedback

    AI helps identify gaps. Human gates inspect the relevant work. Revise your submission and explain what changed.

  6. Demonstrate and hand over

    Present the connected evidence, make a live change and respond to a failure. Receive an assessment of demonstrated skills and remaining supervision needs.

Try a complete sample lessonInspect the worked projects

FICTIONAL TEACHING EXAMPLE

What useful reviewer feedback looks like

This is an illustrative review of a fictional draft. It is not a testimonial, a real learner result or a completed human assessment. Your assessed task uses different inputs.

Commercial professional: renewal meeting brief

Draft to review: “Confirm a 10% discount and tell the buyer service will be restored on Friday.”

Source evidence: The buyer requested consideration of a 10% discount [MT-01]. No discount is approved [AC-01]. No verified restoration estimate is recorded [SV-01]. External commitments need separate approval [POL-02].

Illustrative reviewer comment: You turned a request into an approved offer and invented a recovery date. Keep both as open questions. Show the source for each fact, identify the approval owner and retain the output as a draft.

Improved example: “The buyer asked us to consider a 10% discount. No discount is approved. Recovery time is unknown. Ask the service manager for an approved update; do not send or promise a change.”

Further evidence: Retain the original output, the corrected draft and a changed-input test. If you configure a tool, show the approval and the resulting stored state. An improved paragraph alone does not prove the workflow works.

Marketing or GTM professional: campaign analysis

Fictional input: Spend 1,200 units; 60 leads; 12 qualified leads.

Draft to review: “Cost per qualified lead is 20 units, so scale the campaign.”

Illustrative reviewer comment: You divided by all 60 leads. Cost per qualified lead is 1,200 ÷ 12 = 100 units. Check the denominator, compare the same time period and state what the data cannot prove. These figures do not establish additional revenue.

The same standard across different backgrounds

Client executive or consultant

Prepare a sourced account brief, define a controlled handoff and explain the measured effect on preparation work.

Operations leader or business owner

Choose a limited workflow, compare manual and assisted results, assign approvals and hand over operating responsibility.

Engineer or future FDE

Implement the integration, show denied and approved actions, debug failures, deploy to an authorized training environment and demonstrate recovery.

Your evidence portfolio

  • Project brief, scope, starting measurements and assumptions.
  • Versioned sources, prompts or configuration and your own contribution.
  • Expected and actual results, failed cases and corrections.
  • Permission and approval evidence, plus deployment or supervised acceptance evidence for your track.
  • Measured work impact, costs, handover and remaining limits.
  • Human feedback and the final assessment within the inspected scope.

Real outcomes will be published with permission

The founding pilot is intended to measure completion, work quality and support effort. We have not published verified learner results here. Case studies require actual evidence, review and the learner’s consent. Sponsored participation will be disclosed. No percentage gain, graduate count, client placement or earnings claim is assumed.

Review the offer and global pricing